Skip to main content

Little Caesars: Good Business Model, Not-So-Good Pizza

I like to tell my friends that I lost the weight but not the appetite. And my appetite for pizza is never satiated. Thin crust, thick crust, it's all good to me.

Well... not all of it. I honestly can't say Little Caesars is disgusting, but it is definitely not favorable. If I had to choose between Little Caesars and pretty much every burger place on the face of the earth, I would go for the burger, for sure. Clearly, I am not in Little Caesars' demographic.

Still, I have to hand it to the company. They have changed their business model and marketing plan in a way that has made them once again a key player in this over-saturated industry. Let's take a look at how this sub-par pizza maintains relevance in today's modern society.

Obviously, one of the biggest selling points of their pizzas is their price point. Five bucks is a steal at any rate, but they had to make some big compromises in quality to get them down to that point. Here's the thing though: as much as people want to attribute price point to Little Caesars' success, that's only one factor in their success. After all, I mentioned I would prefer a burger to their pizza, and I can eat cheaper at McDonald's than even Little Caesars' low price point. That probably leads you to the next factor: the quantity of food you get per the price point. Can I feed a family for less than five bucks at McDonalds? Probably not.

This is where the post gets interesting. I think the real key to their success is found in two lesser analyzed factors.

The first has to do with their partnership with Family Video. I'm currently reading through the book Mindless Eating (an excellent read, by the way), and one of the biggest findings of the book is that we all have the tendency to eat more while watching TV. When most people go to Family Video, they have the tendency to watch their movie as soon as they get home. Mindless Eating's studies have also shown that people have the tendency to choose the food option that requires the least amount of work. This rules out even the classic popcorn as it requires popping in a microwave. Which leads to Little Caesars' second, more diabolical success factor...

(Can I pause for a second to apologize for abusing the heck out of the word "tendency" in that last paragraph?)

Even more important than the Family Video connection is Little Caesars' "hot and readiness" factor. Excluding single-slice places like Sbarro, Little Caesars is the only chain that offers a pizza immediately available upon order. You might not think this is a big deal, but the implications are huge, especially in regards to decision fatigue. In a former post, I talked about how our brains are not wired to handle lots of decisions well, even decisions as little as whether or not you want cream in your coffee each morning.

This is where Little Caesars excels over other pizza chains. It might not sound like a big deal, but ordering a pizza at any other chain requires a bit of a commitment. Regardless of carryout or delivery, the time placed between order and receiving the pizza is at least five minutes. That five minute number is definitely on the low end. Those 5+ minutes give time for the consumer to think "Did I really want those toppings? Was pizza a good choice at all...?" This increases decision fatigue and often causes consumers to go for the more mindless option, like McDonalds and their super quick turnaround time.

I started writing this post on 3/23 and began reading Mindless Eating on 3/27. Interestingly and coincidentally, the research within that book is affirming all the thoughts shared here. (And now I feel smart. Yay!)

So, what are the implications of this post? Aside from being merely interesting to a person like me, I think a chain like Pizza Hut or Papa Johns should take note. If these pizza chains adopted a model of having specific one-topping pizzas on hand and ready to go immediately, I think they could definitely see an influx of new business. Of course, that's easier said than done, but I still think it's possible.

And if any pizza chain CEOs read this, you can thank me with free pizza for life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five Albums to Listen to This Autumn

There's no doubt in my mind that autumn is my favorite season. I love everything about it. Of course, there are the things like cooler weather and pumpkin-flavored treats, but it goes beyond that for me. Falling at the end of the year (pun not intended), autumn signals an end of sorts in a number of ways. The year is coming to a close, so I find it as a time of reflection. Nostalgia is a very appropriate word here. Anyway, music is something very important to me, and I purposefully don't latch onto a single genre of music since I since there is a time and place for everything. The fall is no exception, so I wanted to share five albums you should give a listen to this autumn. I'll even take it a step further and recommend a specific song from each album, too. Without further ado, let's get into it.

"Money Only Makes You More of Who You Are"

On Christmas Day of 2002, 55-year-old Jack Whittaker was lucky enough to pick the winning numbers of the Powerball, earning him a whopping $314.9 million, the largest ever lottery win at the time. Jack was already doing pretty well for himself as the president of a construction company, so this windfall had pretty much set Jack for life. Shortly after his win, Jack seemed to have his life on track. He donated a good chunk of money to philanthropic efforts. But this lifestyle wasn't to last. Things quickly took a turn for the worse. Foolish with his money, Jack carried around enormous sums of cash in briefcases just because. Because of his reputation of carrying around this cash, he was robbed multiple times. Jack also lost a ton of money literally gambling it away. And if that isn't bad, it gets worse. Jack's granddaughter, only 17 years old, was found dead (presumably murdered), wrapped in a tarp and dumped behind a van, reportedly with many drugs in her system....

Thinking Big

Steve Jobs is often cited as one of the greatest influencers in modern business, and rightfully so. He not only helped to establish one of the largest companies in the world but helped to resurrect that same company from almost certain death in the late 1990s. Time and time again, Jobs helped usher in a new idea via a new product that would ultimately revolutionize the industry again and again. Those familiar with the popular biography by Walter Isaacson will know that Jobs's sustained success had a lot to do with what people called a "reality distortion field". Under this "reality distortion field," Jobs had an almost magical influence to make people truly believe in anything Jobs had to say, regardless of how wacky it seemed at the time . Where some people looked at Jobs as insane because of this, history has proved in favor of Jobs with the success things like the original Macintosh, iPod, iPhone, and even the Pixar Animated Studios. So, what was it ...

Who Do You Think You Are?

Worldview.  Religion.  Outlook.  Passion. Whatever word you choose, we all have some sort of identity. Some people are able to put a finger on that more easily, labeling themselves as Christian or Muslim. Some have a general sense of who they are, noting that they promote family values and being a good person. And then there's another category of people altogether. These people may not admit it to themselves, but there is a particular person, object, or idea that drives their entire lives.  This last group makes me nervous, especially when a person's identity becomes wrapped up in their job.

The Problem with Hierarchical Hiring

I browse LinkedIn pretty often, and the category of things that appears most on that main feed are inspirational quotes by inspirational leaders. Folks like Richard Branson and Simon Sinek appear most often. More specifically, the quotes have a central theme to them: companies need to hire good people.  For example, one of the latest quotes I've seen on my feed include this one from Tina Fey: "In most cases being a good boss means hiring talented people and getting out of their way." That's a great sentiment, but is that really reinforced in reality?