Skip to main content

Deconstructing Why I Don't Think SMART Goals Are All That Smart

If you've been in the work world long enough, I'm sure you've come across SMART goals at one point or another. SMART is a conveniently created acronym to help a person build essentially "reasonable" goals. These criterion are defined as the following:

  • Specific (simple, sensible significant)
  • Measurable (meaningful, motivating)
  • Achievable (agreed, attainable)
  • Relevant (reasonable, realistic and resourced, results-based)
  • Time-bound (time-based, time-limited, time-sensitive)

At first blush, I think most anybody can agree that these are good things to hold to. I've seen them practiced in organizational performance development, and I know they were deeply espoused in my Master's degree.

But I'm not sold on these criterion. When trying to recently use this formula for myself, I found myself frustrated by the limitations imposed by this method. Just like the title of this post says, I don't think SMART goals are all that smart. Let's deconstruct each of these criterion and examine why.

SPECIFIC

My problem with being specific is that a person tends to sweat the details to reach that goal. This isn't a bad thing in a setting like losing weight, but this can be severely detrimental in a business setting. I have sat in meetings for well-intentioned efforts immediately delve down into the ultimately valueless details because they served as a means to get to that end goal. When we focus on a bigger picture instead of something specific, the details tend to work themselves out. To that end, getting specific with your goals is a bad idea.

MEASURABLE

I honestly don't know why this is important. Because you want to pat yourself on the back in the end...? I think it makes the assumption that we can replicate our practices for similar goals in the future, and I just don't think that's all that true. Plus, specific goals rarely look the same, so I think it's just a waste of time keeping track of what worked and what didn't. We all remember the big things that really went well. Again, when we start sweating the little details, we lose sight of a grander prize.

ACHIEVABLE

I have the biggest problem with this criterion from both an optimistic and pessimistic perspective. From a pessimistic perspective, how do you know you can actually achieve your goal? We're operating under the assumption that your current goal is something that is not a present reality, so how can you certainly say something is or isn't achievable? From a perspective of optimism, how do you know this is the only thing you can achieve? How do you know you can't do more? When I was first losing weight, I set a goal of 50 pounds. After I hit that mark, I opened the goal up to a general "we'll see how far I can go". Turns out I was capable of losing 100 pounds. How do you know your "achievable" goal isn't limiting yourself?

RELEVANT

Of all these criterion, this is probably the only one I can get on board with. But come on, folks: this should be common sense! You don't seek to lose weight by working toward becoming an accountant. They just don't match up. We don't need the R in SMART to tell us that.

TIME-BOUND

Much like my thoughts on "Achievable", you don't truly ever know how long things take. Actually, I can make a pretty solid argument that most short term goals can be achieved much more quickly than what you might think. This is where "time-bound" really becomes a problem. Let's say you set out to earn you PMP within one year. As somebody who has their PMP, I can tell you that while it's tough, it can reasonably be done in about 3-4 months. So if you say in January that you'll get it within the year, guess when you're most likely to actually get it. Yup, December. And it's not because it takes a full year but rather because you allowed yourself the time to dilly dally.


Do you agree with these sentiments, or am I totally off base? Personally, I don't ever see me creating any SMART goals for myself in the future. I don't want to be constrained by a formula that places limitations on me. Instead, I want to see just how far I can push myself because, more often than not, I am surprised by the results. I think you might be surprised at what you're capable of, too, so I would encourage you all to always shoot higher than what you think is reasonable.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Five Albums to Listen to This Autumn

There's no doubt in my mind that autumn is my favorite season. I love everything about it. Of course, there are the things like cooler weather and pumpkin-flavored treats, but it goes beyond that for me. Falling at the end of the year (pun not intended), autumn signals an end of sorts in a number of ways. The year is coming to a close, so I find it as a time of reflection. Nostalgia is a very appropriate word here. Anyway, music is something very important to me, and I purposefully don't latch onto a single genre of music since I since there is a time and place for everything. The fall is no exception, so I wanted to share five albums you should give a listen to this autumn. I'll even take it a step further and recommend a specific song from each album, too. Without further ado, let's get into it.
Post a Comment
Read more

"Money Only Makes You More of Who You Are"

On Christmas Day of 2002, 55-year-old Jack Whittaker was lucky enough to pick the winning numbers of the Powerball, earning him a whopping $314.9 million, the largest ever lottery win at the time. Jack was already doing pretty well for himself as the president of a construction company, so this windfall had pretty much set Jack for life. Shortly after his win, Jack seemed to have his life on track. He donated a good chunk of money to philanthropic efforts. But this lifestyle wasn't to last. Things quickly took a turn for the worse. Foolish with his money, Jack carried around enormous sums of cash in briefcases just because. Because of his reputation of carrying around this cash, he was robbed multiple times. Jack also lost a ton of money literally gambling it away. And if that isn't bad, it gets worse. Jack's granddaughter, only 17 years old, was found dead (presumably murdered), wrapped in a tarp and dumped behind a van, reportedly with many drugs in her system....
Post a Comment
Read more

Thinking Big

Steve Jobs is often cited as one of the greatest influencers in modern business, and rightfully so. He not only helped to establish one of the largest companies in the world but helped to resurrect that same company from almost certain death in the late 1990s. Time and time again, Jobs helped usher in a new idea via a new product that would ultimately revolutionize the industry again and again. Those familiar with the popular biography by Walter Isaacson will know that Jobs's sustained success had a lot to do with what people called a "reality distortion field". Under this "reality distortion field," Jobs had an almost magical influence to make people truly believe in anything Jobs had to say, regardless of how wacky it seemed at the time . Where some people looked at Jobs as insane because of this, history has proved in favor of Jobs with the success things like the original Macintosh, iPod, iPhone, and even the Pixar Animated Studios. So, what was it ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Who Do You Think You Are?

Worldview.  Religion.  Outlook.  Passion. Whatever word you choose, we all have some sort of identity. Some people are able to put a finger on that more easily, labeling themselves as Christian or Muslim. Some have a general sense of who they are, noting that they promote family values and being a good person. And then there's another category of people altogether. These people may not admit it to themselves, but there is a particular person, object, or idea that drives their entire lives.  This last group makes me nervous, especially when a person's identity becomes wrapped up in their job.
Post a Comment
Read more

The Problem with Hierarchical Hiring

I browse LinkedIn pretty often, and the category of things that appears most on that main feed are inspirational quotes by inspirational leaders. Folks like Richard Branson and Simon Sinek appear most often. More specifically, the quotes have a central theme to them: companies need to hire good people.  For example, one of the latest quotes I've seen on my feed include this one from Tina Fey: "In most cases being a good boss means hiring talented people and getting out of their way." That's a great sentiment, but is that really reinforced in reality?
Post a Comment
Read more