Skip to main content

No Man's Sky

If you haven’t heard about No Man’s Sky, take a break from here and go watch any of the plethora of YouTube videos about it.

Reviews of the game have not been kind, and frankly, I can’t blame them. From a gameplay perspective, it truly is a pretty repetitive game. At the time of this writing, I still haven’t finished the game, but I honestly can’t say I’ve found any of the story to be all that exciting either. Inventory management is a pain in the neck, and trying to manage recipes is just downright frustrating.

Yet I love this game.


Sure, there are a lot of valid reasons to rag against it, but I contend that there are enough reasons to love it that I would still encourage anybody to pick up a copy.

There are two main things that keep drawing me back to this game. First, the game is very aesthetically pleasing. Between the music and the textures of outer space, the designers made a truly peaceful game, even amidst the few bits of combat that do exist. I personally enjoy exploring each new planet and seeing what each has to offer in ways of flora and fauna. (I also envy the heck at whoever came up with the game’s font!)

More importantly, what truly astounds me every time I power on my console is what made the game famous: the sheer vastness of the game’s universe. Using procedural generation, the developers were able to build a universe with over 18 quintillion planets. That’s 18 with 18 zeroes behind it. An article from Polygon.com broke it down this way: “It would take about 7.3 billion persons, all working from birth until death, visiting a planet every second of their lives in this game, to see 18.4 quintillion worlds combined.”

Let me put this in perspective. In the early 1970s, a small group of people banded together to work on a super simple game involving two paddles on either side of the screen and a small ball bouncing back and forth between them. You know this game as Pong. Pong is a super simple game with very little graphics, next to no sound, and a replay value that would be laughed out of all modern video game reviewers’ offices.

Fast forward roughly 45 years, a small group of people (about the same size as Pong) creates No Man’s Sky: a game so big that most of the game’s universe will NEVER be visited even by all the combined people playing the game.

WHAT?!

On the timescale of humanity alone, 45 years is almost nothing.

Which brings up this question: if humanity can exponentially grow this much with technology in just 45 years, what will the next 45 years bring?

Or 90 years?

Or 2000 years?

Granted, it is possible that humanity is not able to sustain this momentum, but for fun, let’s say it can. And honestly probably will so long as guys like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos exist. Speaking of Musk, I recently listened to an interview / Q&A time he did with Re-Code at Code Conference 2016. One attendee posed the question that, essentially, if humanity is able to keep the momentum of constantly refining technology and AI that it is possible we could create a reality for somebody to “live in” indistinguishable from a true “base reality”. That said, what are the chances that we are truly living in that base reality and NOT in a simulated universe created by the more highly advanced version of humanity?

I don’t know about you, but that thought definitely keeps me up at night.

Musk provided a few thoughts on this. First, he humorously noted that those sorts of conversations between his brother and him have been permanently banned while they’re relaxing in a hot tub. (Practical advice!) The other thing he noted is that if humanity continues its trajectory of technological advancement, it is certainly plausible that humanity could create a simulation indistinguishable from base reality. Think “The Matrix” or “The Truman Show” here. His only rationale against this trajectory is that humanity experiences a cataclysmic event that effectively ends the world.

Do I have an opinion on this? Kind of. Let’s face facts though: we truly have no way of knowing that we’re living in a Matrix-like reality, so I don’t really find it all that helpful to share my opinion. (Plus, it would make this blog post 8x longer!)


So we’ve come a long way off the beaten path from talking about No Man’s Sky! It is honestly hard to recommend as a game, so my only encouragement is to at least rent it or borrow it from a friend. I still love it and look forward to continuing my journey to the center of the galaxy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Key Competency #4: A Dash of "Not-Care-itude"

As an avid listener of The Tim Ferriss Show  podcast, I listened to a recently uploaded episode complementary to his new book Tools of Titans (review incoming) that covered a number of tough questions he encouraged everybody to ask themselves. One of the questions he shared was, "How would you run your business if you were only allowed to work that business two hours a week?"

Five Games to Play While Listening to Podcasts

I'm a big fan of podcasts. I regularly listen to at least two podcasts every day, ranging from business to comedy to video gaming. Speaking of that last one, the best time to listen to podcasts (aside from exercise) is while playing a video game. Now, you can't just play any video game while listening to podcasts because it's just not conducive in every situation. For example, I would never suggest you play something like Call of Duty online while listening to a podcast. All your brainpower will go to the game and zero to the podcast. So when coming up with this list, I held to these couple of criterion for games suitable for simultaneous podcast: Can't be heavily story driven (Looking at you, Telltale Games) Can't be something that involves a ton of strategy Can't can't CAN'T be multiplayer Keeping these criterion in mind, here are five games I'd suggest you check out.

I'm Not the Tech Expert You Think I Am (Top 5)

Amongst my family and friends, and I am known as the tech guru. Any time they have any questions, I'm usually the first guy they call. And it's pretty understandable why: 9 times out of 10, I can help solve their problems. It's kinda weird and doesn't make sense to me. For example, I've been asked numerous times for help with something on Facebook. Um...... I don't have Facebook. (Well, at least, not anymore. I had one from 2008-2011 but haven't had one since.) This isn't to say, however, that I am useless here. In fact, my track record for solving Facebook questions is 100% so far. So what is it about me? As the title of this posts suggests, I'll be the first to raise my hand and tell you that I am not a tech expert. I have no formal training, no formal IT certifications, and only took one computer programming class in high school. So what I hope you learn from this post is what you can apply to become a "tech expert" yourself.

About LYEATT

This is my third attempt at starting a blog like this. Each other time I started, I was so concerned about views. How many people read what I wrote? Did anybody express appreciation over it? Did anybody have any other thoughts to share about it? The truth is, I heard nothing. Seemingly nobody cared! Although… I should say that really didn’t give either much to gain traction. Each maybe had three or four posts before my self-consciousness got the better of me and shut them down. So why now? Why try again?

Decision Fatigue and Five Tips to Avert It

One of the best things about living in Bloomington-Normal is the diversity of restaurant choices we have to choose from. Want one of the big chains? We've probably got it. Nice local restaurants? Yup. Italian, Chinese, American, Thai, and Indian places? Check. Ironically, one of the worst things about living in Bloomington-Normal is, you guessed it, the diversity of restaurant choices we have to choose from.