Skip to main content

Memory Studies: A Thousand Foot Overview

This is a big topic that I feel merits two separate posts for now. I might even revisit this topic again in the future. For now, the first part will cover a very, very high level discussion on memory studies, and the next blog post will cover why these memory studies are critical in thinking through marketing strategies.


(Before jumping in, I’d like to share that a lot of this material came from Dr. Anthony Le Donne’s book, Historical Jesus: What Can We Know and How We Can Know It. While some of the material is directed at Historical Jesus studies, his summaries on memory are absolutely excellent and well worth reading.)

So I want to open this post by debunking a seemingly obvious myth and our first big point: Memory is not an objective input-output system.

To use an analogy, I frequently begin writing my blog posts in Microsoft Word so that if I need to step away, I can save and come back to it at a later point. When I re-open the saved document, everything shows up just how I saved it in the first place.

That is NOT at all how memory works. Memory is largely colored by our experiences and newly gained knowledge from other, possibly even wholly unrelated things. If Microsoft Word documents reflected memory, you might open a saved document to see that font has changed, certain words have been bolded or underlined, content created or deleted, and far, far more. What we can know for sure is that it will not look the same.

You can probably think of many instances in which the way you perceive things change over time. Children do this all the time. One of the first spherical objects a kid learns about is a ball, so it’s not atypical for a kid to refer to everything as a ball. That child will learn over time that there are differences between basketballs, soccer balls and golf balls. The kid will also learn that other non-spherical shapes may also be referred to as balls, like footballs. And other spherical things, like the sun, aren’t balls at all!

In the analogy above, you can also see how the mind likes to categorize things and how that categorization evolved over time. Things started out as balls and evolved into categories of sports balls, categories of spherical shapes that aren’t sports balls, and categories of balls that you still play sports with but aren’t spherical.

Which brings us to a second big point: Our minds classify and recognize things from already-established categories, and those categories themselves can evolve over time. Aside from just balls, our minds categorize everything. Food, animals, books, abstract ideas, feelings, and yes, people.

Some folks have figured out that they can interestingly use this idea of categorization and relational thinking into memorizing other obscure things like the precise order of a 52 card deck or serial number. Check out the YouTube video below:


I covered some huge ideas here, and I can think of a clean way to tie up these ideas in a nice little knot. This single post doesn’t do them justice. My next post will cover how these ideas in conjunction with my recently written post on trust are important to the principles of marketing. Check back here in a day or so for that!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Beware the Grammar Police

We all know those folks. The people who persistently point out where a comma was misplaced, where a word was misspelled, and where something wasn't properly capitalized. Mistakes happen, and spelling / grammar is definitely important. But when a person takes it upon themselves to start correcting these minor mistakes, there is a much deeper problem going on.

Decision Fatigue and Five Tips to Avert It

One of the best things about living in Bloomington-Normal is the diversity of restaurant choices we have to choose from. Want one of the big chains? We've probably got it. Nice local restaurants? Yup. Italian, Chinese, American, Thai, and Indian places? Check. Ironically, one of the worst things about living in Bloomington-Normal is, you guessed it, the diversity of restaurant choices we have to choose from.

Five Undergrad Courses I Wish I Could Retake

Education is a tricky thing. Many jobs require you to learn things prior to you getting on the job, but sometimes, that education is more valued in retrospect. What is and what isn't valuable gets especially lost in four year degrees that mandate something like 130 credit hours for graduation. A college isn't going to tell you, "These classes are important, and these classes... not so much." To be fair to colleges, value is a subjective thing. What I might have found valuable might be different to somebody else. This is especially true for a more general major like mine, Business Administration. I took courses in macroeconomics, marketing, communications, finance, accounting, HR management, and more. If you go ask my fellow graduates which courses they valued the most, I bet every one of them would give you different answers. Anyway, I was reflecting back on my own undergraduate education and thinking about the classes I wish I could go retake. It's not that I...

Redeeming Rob Bell

Well, that's probably a name you heard in a while! For those of you not familiar with that name, Rob Bell was (and kind of still is?) a big name in the Christian community. He is the former megachurch founder and pastor of Mars Hill Bible Church, wrote widely read books Sex God  and Velvet Elvis , and is probably most widely known for his NOOMA video series. In 2011, Rob Bell had a big falling out with the Christian community following the release of his book, Love Wins . In that book, he contended that people would be able to accept Jesus and enter heaven after death in addition to before death, which many people misconstrued as universalism. (Which is not particularly right... but I can see why people would draw that conclusion.) Having attended a Christian school at the time, I was right in the thick of the controversy. People freaked out. Having been looked at as a Christian hero in the community for the longest time, people were floored with the sentiments shared in Love...

The Problem with Hierarchical Hiring

I browse LinkedIn pretty often, and the category of things that appears most on that main feed are inspirational quotes by inspirational leaders. Folks like Richard Branson and Simon Sinek appear most often. More specifically, the quotes have a central theme to them: companies need to hire good people.  For example, one of the latest quotes I've seen on my feed include this one from Tina Fey: "In most cases being a good boss means hiring talented people and getting out of their way." That's a great sentiment, but is that really reinforced in reality?