Skip to main content

Public Perception vs. Advertiser's Perception (Feat. Nintendo Switch)

Last week, Nintendo unveiled to the world its next generation of home console: the Nintendo Switch. They did so in a roughly three minute video not specifically talking about the features but rather showcasing what gamers will be able to do in real life situations. If you haven't seen it yet, you can watch the video below:


Amidst lots of other chatter about the unveiling, Nintendo was widely praised amongst many outlets for purposefully not using children in their initial unveiling. This is because, as you may be aware, Nintendo has been largely viewed as the video game console maker for kids recently, especially when compared to the likes of PlayStation and Xbox.

As a big Nintendo fan myself, I, too, had the same reaction when watching that video. I thought, "Finally, Nintendo is looking to break the mold they set with the last console generations."

Here is where things get interesting.

Enter tech journalism site, TechnoBuffalo. Primarily focusing on consumer electronics in general (e.g. smartphones, laptops), TechnoBuffalo doesn't place a huge focus on gaming content as would an IGN or GameSpot, but they had a very interesting perspective on the Nintendo Switch.


To summarize what that article says, TechnoBuffalo went back and looked at previous console unveilings to see how they compared to the Nintendo Switch's unveiling. The results might surprise you. (They did for me!)

The Wii U? No children.
The Nintendo DS? No children.
The Nintendo 3DS? No children.

And moreover, that last one was unveiled with a parade of supermodels. Not exactly child friendly imagery!

So where the public was praising Nintendo for "finally getting away from children," this actually wasn't new at all for Nintendo

Let's talk about why this may be, since I have a couple of different theories. It is well documented within the docu-drama of a book, Console Wars, that Nintendo all the way back in the days of the Super Nintendo that they wanted to be a family friendly system. Granted, that was well over 20 years ago now, and the console unveilings of the last decade seem to lend toward Nintendo not perceiving themselves that way anymore.

I think it has more to do with their first party titles. Look at game series like Mario, Zelda, Animal Crossing, and the recent Splatoon. Those tend mostly to be kid games, right?

Well, I actually beg to differ. While Nintendo might purposefully set out to create some titles for kids (e.g. the Mario Party line), I think that their goal, to borrow from Apple, is to think differently. Where other AAA game companies are seeking to create super realistic games that often involve a lot of adult-themed blood and gore, Nintendo is seeking to establish themselves as a game company who makes great games that don't fall in that category.

It just happens to work out that these titles end up being family friendly.

Because of this, parents have made Nintendo their "go to" choice when buying a console because they know Nintendo is much more likely to offer kid-friendly content than the other systems.

So let's take a step back now and look at the implications of this beyond just Nintendo. Can the public's perception of a product influence perception more strongly than the advertiser's perception?

Like all things in life, I don't think there is a clear black-and-white answer. For Nintendo, it's clear that the public has perceived the nature of its products to be one thing over how it is actually advertised.

Let me use another example of that: Minecraft. (Sorry for using another video game reference. It was the first to come to mind!) Minecraft is largely perceived to be a kids game because of the simple gameplay, colorful UI, and LEGO-like creativity. But, much like with Nintendo, Minecraft does not perceive themselves this way. The creator, Marcus "Notch" Persson, did not set out to create a children's game. Notch was just creating a game for the general gaming community, and if you don't believe this, watch the "endgame" of Minecraft. It's a gigantic, philosophical poem that goes way over the head of any ten year old. (Whoops, spoiler alert...?)

Let's look at some other non-video game examples. Apparently, Listerine was originally marketed as surgical antiseptic and a cure for gonorrhea. Definitely not how it is used (or marketed) today! Oh, and how about Viagara? Before its days of helping old men get... well, you know... it was designed and marketed as heart medication. Apparently the original designers behind Play-Doh thought it would make for a good wallpaper cleaner. I'm sure mothers around the world would love their kids sticking Play-Doh to the wall!

So we've found that when it comes to marketing that the public's perceived nature of a product can outweigh the advertiser's perceived nature, but I should end with saying that this tends to be the exception and not the rule. Sure, I found some examples above, but it took me googling several different phrases before I was able to find them. Generally speaking, the advertiser's perception falls right in line with the public.

Mountain Dew is Mountain Dew.
McDonalds is McDonalds.
Nike is Nike 
Donald Trump is Donald Trump.

(Actually, you might be able to argue that last one!)


It's still an interesting concept, nevertheless, and something companies might want to keep in mind as they develop products with a somewhat ambiguous nature.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five Albums to Listen to This Autumn

There's no doubt in my mind that autumn is my favorite season. I love everything about it. Of course, there are the things like cooler weather and pumpkin-flavored treats, but it goes beyond that for me. Falling at the end of the year (pun not intended), autumn signals an end of sorts in a number of ways. The year is coming to a close, so I find it as a time of reflection. Nostalgia is a very appropriate word here. Anyway, music is something very important to me, and I purposefully don't latch onto a single genre of music since I since there is a time and place for everything. The fall is no exception, so I wanted to share five albums you should give a listen to this autumn. I'll even take it a step further and recommend a specific song from each album, too. Without further ado, let's get into it.

"Money Only Makes You More of Who You Are"

On Christmas Day of 2002, 55-year-old Jack Whittaker was lucky enough to pick the winning numbers of the Powerball, earning him a whopping $314.9 million, the largest ever lottery win at the time. Jack was already doing pretty well for himself as the president of a construction company, so this windfall had pretty much set Jack for life. Shortly after his win, Jack seemed to have his life on track. He donated a good chunk of money to philanthropic efforts. But this lifestyle wasn't to last. Things quickly took a turn for the worse. Foolish with his money, Jack carried around enormous sums of cash in briefcases just because. Because of his reputation of carrying around this cash, he was robbed multiple times. Jack also lost a ton of money literally gambling it away. And if that isn't bad, it gets worse. Jack's granddaughter, only 17 years old, was found dead (presumably murdered), wrapped in a tarp and dumped behind a van, reportedly with many drugs in her system....

Thinking Big

Steve Jobs is often cited as one of the greatest influencers in modern business, and rightfully so. He not only helped to establish one of the largest companies in the world but helped to resurrect that same company from almost certain death in the late 1990s. Time and time again, Jobs helped usher in a new idea via a new product that would ultimately revolutionize the industry again and again. Those familiar with the popular biography by Walter Isaacson will know that Jobs's sustained success had a lot to do with what people called a "reality distortion field". Under this "reality distortion field," Jobs had an almost magical influence to make people truly believe in anything Jobs had to say, regardless of how wacky it seemed at the time . Where some people looked at Jobs as insane because of this, history has proved in favor of Jobs with the success things like the original Macintosh, iPod, iPhone, and even the Pixar Animated Studios. So, what was it ...

Who Do You Think You Are?

Worldview.  Religion.  Outlook.  Passion. Whatever word you choose, we all have some sort of identity. Some people are able to put a finger on that more easily, labeling themselves as Christian or Muslim. Some have a general sense of who they are, noting that they promote family values and being a good person. And then there's another category of people altogether. These people may not admit it to themselves, but there is a particular person, object, or idea that drives their entire lives.  This last group makes me nervous, especially when a person's identity becomes wrapped up in their job.

The Problem with Hierarchical Hiring

I browse LinkedIn pretty often, and the category of things that appears most on that main feed are inspirational quotes by inspirational leaders. Folks like Richard Branson and Simon Sinek appear most often. More specifically, the quotes have a central theme to them: companies need to hire good people.  For example, one of the latest quotes I've seen on my feed include this one from Tina Fey: "In most cases being a good boss means hiring talented people and getting out of their way." That's a great sentiment, but is that really reinforced in reality?